The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Corrigendum: Metagenome Analysis of Intestinal Bacteria in Healthy People, Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Colorectal Cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, September 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fcimb.2021.765843 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yongshun Ma, Yao Zhang, Houxiang Jiang, Shixin Xiang, Yueshui Zhao, Mintao Xiao, Fukuan Du, Huijiao Ji, Parham Jabbarzadeh Kaboli, Xu Wu, Mingxing Li, Qinglian Wen, Jing Shen, Zhongming Yang, Jing Li, Zhangang Xiao |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2021.
All research outputs
#14,555,398
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#2,891
of 6,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,227
of 433,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#173
of 390 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 390 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.