The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Why is Kangaroo Mother Care not yet scaled in the UK? A systematic review and realist synthesis of a frugal innovation for newborn care
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMJ Innovations, October 2021
|
DOI | 10.1136/bmjinnov-2021-000828 |
Authors |
Giulietta Stefani, Mark Skopec, Cheryl Battersby, Matthew Harris |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 33% |
United States | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
Researcher | 4 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
Lecturer | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 12% |
Unknown | 23 | 53% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 12% |
Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 5% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 24 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,145,087
of 25,923,151 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Innovations
#27
of 267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,520
of 445,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Innovations
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,923,151 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 267 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.