The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Feasibility and effectiveness of daily temperature screening to detect COVID-19 in a prospective cohort at a large public university
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, September 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12889-021-11697-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shelley N. Facente, Lauren A. Hunter, Laura J. Packel, Yi Li, Anna Harte, Guy Nicolette, Shana McDevitt, Maya Petersen, Arthur L. Reingold |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 25% |
Chile | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 7% |
Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 3 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
Other | 11 | 20% |
Unknown | 26 | 48% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 9% |
Engineering | 4 | 7% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 15% |
Unknown | 26 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2024.
All research outputs
#5,020,861
of 26,228,764 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,029
of 18,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,873
of 427,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#119
of 339 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,228,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 339 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.