The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A Science Agenda to Inform Natural Resource Management Decisions in an Era of Ecological Transformation
|
---|---|
Published in |
BioScience, November 2021
|
DOI | 10.1093/biosci/biab102 |
Authors |
Shelley D Crausbay, Helen R Sofaer, Amanda E Cravens, Brian C Chaffin, Katherine R Clifford, John E Gross, Corrine N Knapp, David J Lawrence, Dawn R Magness, Abraham J Miller-Rushing, Gregor W Schuurman, Camille S Stevens-Rumann |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 97 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 20 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 19% |
Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 3% |
Other | 9 | 9% |
Unknown | 35 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 22 | 23% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 19% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 7% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
Engineering | 2 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 5% |
Unknown | 40 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2021.
All research outputs
#2,533,938
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BioScience
#766
of 2,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,138
of 518,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience
#15
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.