↓ Skip to main content

Account for the Full Extent of Esophagus Motion in Radiation Therapy Planning: A Preliminary Study of the IRV of the Esophagus

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Account for the Full Extent of Esophagus Motion in Radiation Therapy Planning: A Preliminary Study of the IRV of the Esophagus
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, November 2021
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2021.734552
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aihui Feng, Hengle Gu, Hua Chen, Yan Shao, Hao Wang, Yanhua Duan, Ying Huang, Tao Zhou, Zhiyong Xu

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2021.
All research outputs
#20,739,552
of 25,478,886 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#11,394
of 22,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#386,917
of 514,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#621
of 1,348 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,478,886 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,568 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 514,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,348 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.