Aitken, Stuart, Bharathavikru, Ruthrothaselvi, Stuart Aitken, Ruthrothaselvi Bharathavikru
Editors
Nicholas Hastie
Abstract
Differential gene expression analysis has been conventionally performed by microarray techniques; however with the recent advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) approaches, it has become easier to analyze the coding as well as the noncoding components. Additionally, NGS data analysis also provides information regarding the expression changes of specific isoforms. There are several bioinformatics tools available to analyze NGS data but with different parameters. This chapter provides a comparative insight into these tools by utilizing NGS datasets available from Wt1 knockout and embryonic stem cell line model.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2016.
All research outputs
#20,335,770
of 22,880,691 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,918
of 13,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,756
of 393,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#1,054
of 1,471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
