The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Perineal skin tear repair following vaginal birth; skin adhesive versus conventional suture – a randomised controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, June 2020
|
DOI | 10.1080/01443615.2020.1740917 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rima Anggrena Dasrilsyah, Aida Kalok, Beng Kwang Ng, Anizah Ali, Kah Teik Chew, Pei Shan Lim |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 5% |
Student > Master | 3 | 5% |
Professor | 3 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 18% |
Unknown | 30 | 53% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 18% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 14% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Psychology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 5% |
Unknown | 31 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2020.
All research outputs
#22,771,990
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#1,229
of 1,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#375,280
of 433,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#13
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,446 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.