The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Discussing the Drawbacks of the Implementation of Access and Benefit Sharing of the Nagoya Protocol Following the COVID-19 Pandemic
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, December 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2021.639581 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sally Mueni Katee, Christian Keambou Tiambo |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Kenya | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 24% |
Unspecified | 2 | 12% |
Researcher | 2 | 12% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 24% |
Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 18% |
Unspecified | 2 | 12% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 24% |
Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2021.
All research outputs
#16,191,677
of 24,629,540 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#5,000
of 12,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#278,674
of 513,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#283
of 746 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,629,540 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,862 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 513,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 746 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.