The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Impact of Citrus Pulp or Inulin on Intestinal Microbiota and Metabolites, Barrier, and Immune Function of Weaned Piglets
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, December 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2021.650211 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Julie Uerlings, Ester Arévalo Sureda, Martine Schroyen, Kikianne Kroeske, Sofie Tanghe, Maartje De Vos, Geert Bruggeman, José Wavreille, Jérôme Bindelle, Giorgia Purcaro, Nadia Everaert |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
Unspecified | 2 | 10% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
Student > Master | 1 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 20% |
Unknown | 9 | 45% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 15% |
Unspecified | 2 | 10% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 10% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 15% |
Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2022.
All research outputs
#15,630,207
of 23,853,707 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#2,576
of 5,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,656
of 505,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#206
of 455 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,853,707 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,526 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 505,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 455 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.