↓ Skip to main content

MicroRNA dysregulation in multiple sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MicroRNA dysregulation in multiple sclerosis
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2012.00311
Pubmed ID
Authors

Omar de Faria, Craig S. Moore, Timothy E. Kennedy, Jack P. Antel, Amit Bar-Or, Ajit S. Dhaunchak

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by central nervous system (CNS) demyelination and axonal degeneration. Although the cause of MS is still unknown, it is widely accepted that novel drug targets need to focus on both decreasing inflammation and promoting CNS repair. In MS and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, non-coding small microRNAs (miRNAs) are dysregulated in the immune system and CNS. Since individual miRNAs are able to down-regulate multiple targeted mRNA transcripts, even minor changes in miRNA expression may lead to significant alterations in gene expression. Herein, we review miRNA signatures reported in CNS tissue and immune cells of MS patients and consider how altered miRNA expression may influence MS pathology.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 131 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 22%
Student > Master 21 16%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 14 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 18%
Neuroscience 15 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 21 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2013.
All research outputs
#14,160,293
of 22,693,205 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#3,888
of 11,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,448
of 280,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#160
of 319 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,693,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,755 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 319 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.