The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Low‐cost grass restoration using erosion barriers in a degraded African rangeland
|
---|---|
Published in |
Restoration Ecology, September 2016
|
DOI | 10.1111/rec.12426 |
Authors |
David W. Kimiti, Corinna Riginos, Jayne Belnap |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 14% |
Kenya | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 87 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 25 | 29% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 17% |
Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
Other | 10 | 11% |
Unknown | 12 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 31 | 36% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 23% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Unknown | 20 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2023.
All research outputs
#4,437,526
of 26,427,317 outputs
Outputs from Restoration Ecology
#455
of 1,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,024
of 343,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Restoration Ecology
#9
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,427,317 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.