You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Bacterial Signatures of Paediatric Respiratory Disease: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, December 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2021.711134 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David T. J. Broderick, David W. Waite, Robyn L. Marsh, Carlos A. Camargo, Paul Cardenas, Anne B. Chang, William O. C. Cookson, Leah Cuthbertson, Wenkui Dai, Mark L. Everard, Alain Gervaix, J. Kirk Harris, Kohei Hasegawa, Lucas R. Hoffman, Soo-Jong Hong, Laurence Josset, Matthew S. Kelly, Bong-Soo Kim, Yong Kong, Shuai C. Li, Jonathan M. Mansbach, Asuncion Mejias, George A. O’Toole, Laura Paalanen, Marcos Pérez-Losada, Melinda M. Pettigrew, Maxime Pichon, Octavio Ramilo, Lasse Ruokolainen, Olga Sakwinska, Patrick C. Seed, Christopher J. van der Gast, Brandie D. Wagner, Hana Yi, Edith T. Zemanick, Yuejie Zheng, Naveen Pillarisetti, Michael W. Taylor |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ecuador | 8 | 36% |
United States | 4 | 18% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 14% |
Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
Canada | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 5 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 50% |
Scientists | 8 | 36% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 15 | 58% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 15 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,832,303
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#2,279
of 29,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,186
of 518,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#44
of 985 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,761 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 985 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.