The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Cold Hand Sign in Multiple System Atrophy: Frequency-Associated Factors and Its Impact on Survival
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, December 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2021.767211 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bei Cao, Yan Liang, Ling-Yu Zhang, Yan-Bing Hou, Ru-Wei Ou, Qian-qian Wei, Huifang Shang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Finland | 1 | 50% |
Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2022.
All research outputs
#17,776,263
of 22,831,537 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#3,800
of 4,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#337,123
of 497,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#199
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,831,537 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,780 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 497,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.