The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effect of Cold Spells and Their Different Definitions on Mortality in Shenzhen, China
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, January 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2021.817079 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chengzhen Meng, Fang Ke, Yao Xiao, Suli Huang, Yanran Duan, Gang Liu, Shuyuan Yu, Yingbin Fu, Ji Peng, Jinquan Cheng, Ping Yin |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 15% |
Unspecified | 2 | 15% |
Student > Master | 2 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 3 | 23% |
Unspecified | 2 | 15% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 15% |
Mathematics | 1 | 8% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2022.
All research outputs
#18,554,389
of 22,979,862 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#5,827
of 10,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#361,833
of 501,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#409
of 811 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,979,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 501,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 811 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.