The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparison of Various Vagal Maneuvers for Supraventricular Tachycardia by Network Meta-Analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, February 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2021.769437 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Edward Pei-Chuan Huang, Chi-Hsin Chen, Cheng-Yi Fan, Chih-Wei Sung, Pei Chun Lai, Yen Ta Huang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 25% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
United States | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Researcher | 2 | 5% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
Librarian | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 24 | 62% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 28% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
Engineering | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 24 | 62% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2024.
All research outputs
#2,084,141
of 26,327,128 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#610
of 7,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,392
of 534,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#47
of 636 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,327,128 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 534,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 636 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.