↓ Skip to main content

The clean energy claims of BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil and Shell: A mismatch between discourse, actions and investments

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
297 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The clean energy claims of BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil and Shell: A mismatch between discourse, actions and investments
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2022
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0263596
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mei Li, Gregory Trencher, Jusen Asuka

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 439 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 297 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 297 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 10%
Researcher 25 8%
Student > Master 21 7%
Unspecified 17 6%
Student > Bachelor 15 5%
Other 35 12%
Unknown 155 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 20 7%
Social Sciences 19 6%
Unspecified 17 6%
Environmental Science 17 6%
Engineering 13 4%
Other 51 17%
Unknown 160 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1625. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2024.
All research outputs
#7,248
of 26,237,457 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#84
of 232,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#329
of 457,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#5
of 4,170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,237,457 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 232,397 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.