The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 175 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Demographic implications of lead poisoning for eagles across North America
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.abj3068 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vincent A Slabe, James T Anderson, Brian A Millsap, Jeffrey L Cooper, Alan R Harmata, Marco Restani, Ross H Crandall, Barbara Bodenstein, Peter H Bloom, Travis Booms, John Buchweitz, Renee Culver, Kim Dickerson, Robert Domenech, Ernesto Dominguez-Villegas, Daniel Driscoll, Brian W Smith, Michael J Lockhart, David McRuer, Tricia A Miller, Patricia A Ortiz, Krysta Rogers, Matt Schwarz, Natalie Turley, Brian Woodbridge, Myra E Finkelstein, Christian A Triana, Christopher R DeSorbo, Todd E Katzner |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 28 | 16% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| India | 3 | 2% |
| Comoros | 2 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Georgia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 130 | 74% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 129 | 74% |
| Scientists | 30 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 94 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 41 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 26% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 14% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 44 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2494. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2024.
All research outputs
#3,253
of 26,563,746 outputs
Outputs from Science
#171
of 84,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171
of 456,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#8
of 470 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,563,746 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 84,189 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 470 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.