The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Wildfire probability models calibrated using past human and lightning ignition patterns can inform mitigation of post-fire hydrologic hazards
|
---|---|
Published in |
Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, February 2022
|
DOI | 10.1080/19475705.2022.2039787 |
Authors |
Miguel L. Villarreal, Laura M. Norman, Erika H. Yao, Caroline R. Conrad |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 35% |
Unknown | 11 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 14 | 82% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 12% |
Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 32% |
Student > Master | 4 | 21% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 5 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 4 | 21% |
Engineering | 4 | 21% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 5% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2022.
All research outputs
#3,401,549
of 26,588,416 outputs
Outputs from Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk
#25
of 233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,872
of 457,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,588,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 233 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.