The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Institutional trust, beliefs, and evaluation of regulations, and management of chronic wasting disease (CWD)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Human Dimensions of Wildlife, August 2020
|
DOI | 10.1080/10871209.2020.1808915 |
Authors |
Susan A. Schroeder, Adam C. Landon, Louis Cornicelli, David C. Fulton, Leslie McInenly |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 16% |
Researcher | 5 | 13% |
Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Unknown | 14 | 37% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 16% |
Environmental Science | 5 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 11% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 13% |
Unknown | 16 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#798,646
of 25,582,611 outputs
Outputs from Human Dimensions of Wildlife
#15
of 367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,263
of 426,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Dimensions of Wildlife
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,582,611 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 367 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.