↓ Skip to main content

Angioplasty versus stenting for subclavian artery stenosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Angioplasty versus stenting for subclavian artery stenosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2022
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008461.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wagner Iared, José Eduardo Mourão, Andrea Puchnick, Fernando Soma, David Carlos Shigueoka

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Student > Master 6 8%
Librarian 4 6%
Researcher 4 6%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 31 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Psychology 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 40 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2022.
All research outputs
#8,732,200
of 26,580,681 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,651
of 13,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,581
of 459,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#100
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,580,681 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,247 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.