The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Local Insect Availability Partly Explains Geographical Differences in Floral Visitor Assemblages of Arum maculatum L. (Araceae)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, March 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2022.838391 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Danae Laina, Eva Gfrerer, Valerie Scheurecker, Roman Fuchs, Marielle Schleifer, Carina Zittra, Rüdiger Wagner, Marc Gibernau, Hans Peter Comes, Anja C. Hörger, Stefan Dötterl |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Austria | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 14% |
Student > Master | 2 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 14% |
Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 36% |
Unspecified | 2 | 14% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2022.
All research outputs
#13,011,472
of 23,452,723 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#5,268
of 21,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,339
of 440,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#182
of 1,063 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,452,723 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,442 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,063 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.