↓ Skip to main content

Root Reinforcement Improved Performance, Productivity, and Grain Bioactive Quality of Field-Droughted Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa)

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Root Reinforcement Improved Performance, Productivity, and Grain Bioactive Quality of Field-Droughted Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa)
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, March 2022
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2022.860484
Pubmed ID
Authors

Salma Toubali, Mohamed Ait-El-Mokhtar, Abderrahim Boutasknit, Mohamed Anli, Youssef Ait-Rahou, Wissal Benaffari, Hela Ben-Ahmed, Toshiaki Mitsui, Marouane Baslam, Abdelilah Meddich

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Student > Master 3 6%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 23 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 33%
Environmental Science 3 6%
Chemistry 2 4%
Energy 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 25 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2022.
All research outputs
#19,218,473
of 24,471,305 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#13,659
of 23,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#324,569
of 460,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#639
of 1,130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,471,305 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,141 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.