↓ Skip to main content

Calculation Method for Optimizing the Bearing Capacity of Two-Layer Clay Foundation Based on Upper-Bound Limit Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Earth Science, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Calculation Method for Optimizing the Bearing Capacity of Two-Layer Clay Foundation Based on Upper-Bound Limit Analysis
Published in
Frontiers in Earth Science, February 2022
DOI 10.3389/feart.2021.825483
Authors

Xing-Chao Lin, Qiang Zhang, Xianzhi Wang, Yelin Feng, Guina Zhu

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2022.
All research outputs
#20,796,509
of 23,400,864 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Earth Science
#3,201
of 4,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#360,258
of 439,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Earth Science
#318
of 500 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,400,864 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,958 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 500 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.