The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A Geriatric Assessment Intervention to Reduce Treatment Toxicity Among Older Adults With Advanced Lung Cancer: A Subgroup Analysis From a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, March 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2022.835582 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Carolyn J. Presley, Mostafa R. Mohamed, Eva Culakova, Marie Flannery, Pooja H. Vibhakar, Rebecca Hoyd, Arya Amini, Noam VanderWalde, Melisa L. Wong, Yukari Tsubata, Daniel J. Spakowicz, Supriya G. Mohile |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 24 | 67% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 6% |
Psychology | 1 | 3% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 23 | 64% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2022.
All research outputs
#16,595,422
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#6,456
of 22,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,766
of 447,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#426
of 1,534 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,436 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,534 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.