The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
System Architecture of a European Platform for Health Policy Decision Making: MIDAS
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, March 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2022.838438 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xi Shi, Gorana Nikolic, Scott Fischaber, Michaela Black, Debbie Rankin, Gorka Epelde, Andoni Beristain, Roberto Alvarez, Monica Arrue, Joao Pita Costa, Marko Grobelnik, Luka Stopar, Juha Pajula, Adil Umer, Peter Poliwoda, Jonathan Wallace, Paul Carlin, Jarmo Pääkkönen, Bart De Moor |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 23% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
Unspecified | 2 | 9% |
Researcher | 2 | 9% |
Other | 3 | 14% |
Unknown | 6 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 3 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 14% |
Engineering | 2 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 9% |
Computer Science | 2 | 9% |
Other | 3 | 14% |
Unknown | 7 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2022.
All research outputs
#13,014,356
of 23,506,079 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#2,768
of 11,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,609
of 444,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#197
of 1,008 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,506,079 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,008 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.