The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
What Still Needs to be Noted: Pseudo-Clefts in the Academic Discourse of Applied Linguistics
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, May 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.672349 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hui Zhou, Ming Chen |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 1 | 17% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 17% |
Researcher | 1 | 17% |
Lecturer | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Linguistics | 4 | 67% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2022.
All research outputs
#7,727,332
of 23,493,900 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#11,306
of 31,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,629
of 449,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#454
of 1,307 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,493,900 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,326 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,307 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.