↓ Skip to main content

Bet on NETs! Or on How to Translate Basic Science into Clinical Practice

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bet on NETs! Or on How to Translate Basic Science into Clinical Practice
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, October 2016
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00417
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giuseppe A. Ramirez, Angelo A. Manfredi, Patrizia Rovere-Querini, Norma Maugeri

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 24%
Researcher 5 24%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 10%
Neuroscience 2 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2016.
All research outputs
#21,346,871
of 26,203,160 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#25,549
of 32,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,844
of 328,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#143
of 188 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,203,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 188 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.