The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Anatomical Feasibility Study on Novel Ascending Aortic Endograft With More Proximal Landing Zone for Treatment of Type A Aortic Dissection
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, April 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fcvm.2022.843551 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xiaoye Li, Longtu Zhu, Lei Zhang, Chao Song, Hao Zhang, Shibo Xia, Wenying Guo, Zaiping Jing, Qingsheng Lu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2022.
All research outputs
#14,690,931
of 23,530,272 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#1,996
of 7,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,750
of 444,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#283
of 1,006 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,530,272 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,415 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,006 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.