The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The GLIM Criteria Represent a More Appropriate Tool for Nutritional Assessment in Patients With Crohn's Disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, March 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2022.826028 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yong Li, Ziheng Peng, Duo Xu, Yu Peng, Xiaowei Liu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Unknown | 7 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 25% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 13% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 8 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2024.
All research outputs
#15,865,165
of 26,383,000 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#2,903
of 7,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,950
of 453,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#276
of 655 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,383,000 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,506 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 655 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.