Exploring the Validity of Comparative Judgement: Do Judges Attend to Construct-Irrelevant Features?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Education, April 2022

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter: 3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation: 5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley: 3 Mendeley

Summary X Dimensions citations

So far, Altmetric has seen 3 X posts from 3 X users, with an upper bound of 12,603 followers.

RT @cbokhove: And this too. Missed all these in 2022 -> Exploring the Validity of Comparative Judgement: Do Judges Attend to Construct-Irre…

23 Mar 2023

Reply Repost Favourite

And this too. Missed all these in 2022 -> Exploring the Validity of Comparative Judgement: Do Judges Attend to Construct-Irrelevant Features? https://t.co/29YudB1eng

23 Mar 2023

Reply Repost Favourite

New Research: Exploring the Validity of Comparative Judgement: Do Judges Attend to Construct-Irrelevant Features?: When completing a comparative judgment (CJ) exercise, judges are asked to make holistic decisions about the quality of the work… https://t.co

01 May 2022

Reply Repost Favourite

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output.

Click here to find out how to access more activity.