The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Combining rules and dialogue: exploring stakeholder perspectives on preventing sexual boundary violations in mental health and disability care organizations
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, May 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12910-022-00786-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Charlotte Kröger, Eva van Baarle, Guy Widdershoven, Roland Bal, Jan-Willem Weenink |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Spain | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 8 | 26% |
Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
Researcher | 3 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 3% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 13 | 42% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 8 | 26% |
Psychology | 4 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 13 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2023.
All research outputs
#8,242,320
of 24,842,061 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#684
of 1,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,713
of 434,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#11
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,842,061 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,077 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.