↓ Skip to main content

Neural Entrainment vs. Stimulus-Tracking: A Conceptual Challenge for Rhythmic Perceptual Stimulation in Developmental Neuroscience

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neural Entrainment vs. Stimulus-Tracking: A Conceptual Challenge for Rhythmic Perceptual Stimulation in Developmental Neuroscience
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, May 2022
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.878984
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Bánki, Alicja Brzozowska, Stefanie Hoehl, Moritz Köster

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 28%
Student > Master 3 12%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 6 24%
Psychology 3 12%
Philosophy 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 11 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2022.
All research outputs
#12,821,848
of 22,835,198 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#11,681
of 29,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,652
of 438,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#321
of 1,810 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,835,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,824 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,810 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.