The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Development of the Hatagawa Fault Zone clarified by geological and geochronological studies
|
---|---|
Published in |
Earth, Planets and Space, June 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/bf03353308 |
Authors |
Tomoaki Tomita, Tomoyuki Ohtani, Norio Shigematsu, Hidemi Tanaka, Koichiro Fujimoto, Yoji Kobayashi, Yukari Miyashita, Kentaro Omura |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 33% |
Researcher | 4 | 33% |
Professor | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 8% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 11 | 92% |
Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2021.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Planets and Space
#517
of 1,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,098
of 242,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Planets and Space
#15
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.