The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A Nutritional Metabolism Related Prognostic Scoring System for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Osteosarcoma
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, April 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2022.883308 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Longqing Li, Zhuangzhuang Li, Xuanhong He, Yang Wang, Minxun Lu, Taojun Gong, Qing Chang, Jingqi Lin, Yi Luo, Li Min, Yong Zhou, Chongqi Tu |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 20% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 20% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2022.
All research outputs
#16,175,960
of 23,861,036 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#2,897
of 5,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,859
of 431,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#333
of 673 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,861,036 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,535 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 673 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.