↓ Skip to main content

Partial Substitution of Alfalfa Hay by Stevia (Stevia rebaudiana) Hay Can Improve Lactation Performance, Rumen Fermentation, and Nitrogen Utilization of Dairy Cows

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Partial Substitution of Alfalfa Hay by Stevia (Stevia rebaudiana) Hay Can Improve Lactation Performance, Rumen Fermentation, and Nitrogen Utilization of Dairy Cows
Published in
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, May 2022
DOI 10.3389/fvets.2022.899148
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maocheng Jiang, Osmond Datsomor, Zhiqiang Cheng, Zitong Meng, Kang Zhan, Tianyu Yang, Yinghao Huang, Qi Yan, Guoqi Zhao

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Other 3 20%
Unknown 5 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 27%
Environmental Science 2 13%
Unspecified 2 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Materials Science 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2022.
All research outputs
#16,689,083
of 26,287,478 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#3,089
of 8,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,489
of 449,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Veterinary Science
#165
of 562 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,287,478 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,372 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 562 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.