The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Hypofractionated external-beam radiation therapy (HEBRT) versus conventional external-beam radiation (CEBRT) in patients with localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Core Evidence, March 2013
|
DOI | 10.2147/ce.s41178 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tobias Engel Ayer Botrel, Otávio Clark, Antônio Carlos Lima Pompeo, Francisco Flávio Horta Bretas, Marcus Vinicius Sadi, Ubirajara Ferreira, Rodolfo Borges dos Reis |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Portugal | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 38 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 17% |
Other | 6 | 15% |
Student > Master | 6 | 15% |
Researcher | 5 | 12% |
Professor | 3 | 7% |
Other | 12 | 29% |
Unknown | 2 | 5% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 66% |
Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 7% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 5 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2019.
All research outputs
#5,110,978
of 26,485,222 outputs
Outputs from Core Evidence
#15
of 77 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,966
of 207,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Core Evidence
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,485,222 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 77 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.