↓ Skip to main content

Hypofractionated external-beam radiation therapy (HEBRT) versus conventional external-beam radiation (CEBRT) in patients with localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Core Evidence, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hypofractionated external-beam radiation therapy (HEBRT) versus conventional external-beam radiation (CEBRT) in patients with localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Core Evidence, March 2013
DOI 10.2147/ce.s41178
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tobias Engel Ayer Botrel, Otávio Clark, Antônio Carlos Lima Pompeo, Francisco Flávio Horta Bretas, Marcus Vinicius Sadi, Ubirajara Ferreira, Rodolfo Borges dos Reis

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Unknown 38 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Other 6 15%
Student > Master 6 15%
Researcher 5 12%
Professor 3 7%
Other 12 29%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 66%
Physics and Astronomy 3 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 5 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2019.
All research outputs
#5,110,978
of 26,485,222 outputs
Outputs from Core Evidence
#15
of 77 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,966
of 207,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Core Evidence
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,485,222 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 77 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.