You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mitigating climate disruption in time: A self-consistent approach for avoiding both near-term and long-term global warming
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.2123536119 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gabrielle B. Dreyfus, Yangyang Xu, Drew T. Shindell, Durwood Zaelke, Veerabhadran Ramanathan |
| Abstract |
SignificanceThis study clarifies the need for comprehensive CO2 and non-CO2 mitigation approaches to address both near-term and long-term warming. Non-CO2 greenhouse gases (GHGs) are responsible for nearly half of all climate forcing from GHG. However, the importance of non-CO2 pollutants, in particular short-lived climate pollutants, in climate mitigation has been underrepresented. When historical emissions are partitioned into fossil fuel (FF)- and non-FF-related sources, we find that nearly half of the positive forcing from FF and land-use change sources of CO2 emissions has been masked by coemission of cooling aerosols. Pairing decarbonization with mitigation measures targeting non-CO2 pollutants is essential for limiting not only the near-term (next 25 y) warming but also the 2100 warming below 2 °C. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 110 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 79 | 72% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 88 | 80% |
| Scientists | 16 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 30 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Engineering | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 31 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 795. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2024.
All research outputs
#25,138
of 26,245,314 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#752
of 104,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#846
of 448,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#14
of 799 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,245,314 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,593 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 799 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.