The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
HIV Rapid Testing in the General Population and the Usefulness of PrEP in Ecuador: A Cost–Utility Analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Public Health, June 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2022.884313 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Paulina Quirola-Amores, Pablo Espinosa, Sebastian Oleas, Isabel Hernandez, Aquiles R. Henriquez, Enrique Teran |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ecuador | 2 | 18% |
Unknown | 9 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 3 | 18% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 6% |
Professor | 1 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 12% |
Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 18% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 12% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 12% |
Psychology | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2022.
All research outputs
#4,731,224
of 25,051,439 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Public Health
#2,062
of 13,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,904
of 434,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Public Health
#133
of 1,239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,051,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.