↓ Skip to main content

Acupuncture and Traditional Chinese Herbal Medicine Integrated With Conventional Rehabilitation for Post-stroke Functional Recovery: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acupuncture and Traditional Chinese Herbal Medicine Integrated With Conventional Rehabilitation for Post-stroke Functional Recovery: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, March 2022
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2022.851333
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cheng-Yu Tseng, Pei-Shan Hsu, Chang-Ti Lee, Hui-Fen Huang, Chou-Chin Lan, Tsung-Han Hsieh, Guan-Ting Liu, Chan-Yen Kuo, Ming-Chieh Wang, Po-Chun Hsieh

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Researcher 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 19%
Unspecified 2 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Unknown 9 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2024.
All research outputs
#21,687,301
of 26,629,686 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#9,818
of 11,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#345,295
of 458,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#332
of 430 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,629,686 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,987 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 430 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.