The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Serum Total Bilirubin Level Is Associated With Hospital Mortality Rate in Adult Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, October 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2021.697027 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Zhou-Xin Yang, Xiao-Ling Lv, Jing Yan |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 23% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 8 | 62% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 23% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 9 | 69% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,413,245
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#1,649
of 5,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,410
of 429,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#127
of 470 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,506 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 470 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.