↓ Skip to main content

Do Not Judge Human Errors: “Punishing Culture” May Damage Safety Culture

Overview of attention for article published in THE JOURNAL OF JAPAN SOCIETY FOR CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Do Not Judge Human Errors: “Punishing Culture” May Damage Safety Culture
Published in
THE JOURNAL OF JAPAN SOCIETY FOR CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, January 2012
DOI 10.2199/jjsca.32.954
Authors

HAGA Shigeru

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2024.
All research outputs
#15,601,206
of 26,625,282 outputs
Outputs from THE JOURNAL OF JAPAN SOCIETY FOR CLINICAL ANESTHESIA
#93
of 183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,312
of 255,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from THE JOURNAL OF JAPAN SOCIETY FOR CLINICAL ANESTHESIA
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,625,282 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 183 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.