The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluation of Methods for the Extraction of Spatial Muscle Synergies
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, June 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2022.732156 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kunkun Zhao, Haiying Wen, Zhisheng Zhang, Manfredo Atzori, Henning Müller, Zhongqu Xie, Alessandro Scano |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 25% |
Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 17% |
Unspecified | 2 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 5 | 28% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 17% |
Unspecified | 2 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 6 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2022.
All research outputs
#16,465,476
of 26,539,834 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#6,919
of 12,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,412
of 453,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#233
of 481 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,539,834 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,008 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,494 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 481 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.