The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Intermittent Caloric Restriction Promotes Erythroid Development and Ameliorates Phenylhydrazine-Induced Anemia in Mice
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, June 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2022.892435 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Meijuan Bai, Peijuan Cao, Yijun Lin, Pengcheng Yu, Shuo Song, Lingling Chen, Lan Wang, Yan Chen |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 25% |
Lecturer | 1 | 25% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 25% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 25% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,123,064
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#577
of 4,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,656
of 441,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#53
of 716 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,362 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 716 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.