The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Spatio-Temporal Patterns and Source-Dispersion Modeling Towards Sloth Bear–Human Conflict Management in Central India
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Conservation Science, June 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fcosc.2022.850309 |
Authors |
Sankarshan Chaudhuri, Meghna Bandyopadhyay, Rajasekar Rajaraman, Sankar Kalyanasundaram, Sambandam Sathyakumar, Ramesh Krishnamurthy |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Peru | 1 | 25% |
United States | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
Professor | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 5 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 38% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 19% |
Psychology | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2022.
All research outputs
#14,181,583
of 22,729,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#213
of 275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,107
of 439,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#22
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,729,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.