The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A Retrospective Study of Intervertebral Disc Herniation in Dogs in Japan: 297 Cases
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, January 2008
|
DOI | 10.1292/jvms.70.701 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hisanori ITOH, Yasushi HARA, Natsuko YOSHIMI, Yasuji HARADA, Yoshinori NEZU, Takuya YOGO, Hiroki OCHI, Daisuke HASEGAWA, Hiromitsu ORIMA, Masahiro TAGAWA |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 70 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 15 | 21% |
Student > Master | 11 | 15% |
Researcher | 6 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
Other | 12 | 17% |
Unknown | 19 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 30 | 42% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 21% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 10% |
Engineering | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 18 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,657,585
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
#290
of 3,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,378
of 158,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
#3
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,252 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,080 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.