↓ Skip to main content

Changes in Volume of Subregions Within Basal Ganglia in Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder: A Study With Atlas-Based and VBM Methods

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Changes in Volume of Subregions Within Basal Ganglia in Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder: A Study With Atlas-Based and VBM Methods
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, June 2022
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2022.890616
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiaxiang Chen, Chong Tian, Qun Zhang, Hui Xiang, Rongpin Wang, Xiaofei Hu, Xianchun Zeng

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2022.
All research outputs
#15,506,529
of 26,411,386 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#6,323
of 11,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,292
of 450,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#203
of 481 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,411,386 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,990 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,792 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 481 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.