↓ Skip to main content

Chemical Compositions of Dorsal Muscle of Hybrid Amberjacks, Seriola quinqueradiata×S. aureovittata and S. dumerili×S. aureovittata

Overview of attention for article published in Aquaculture Science, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chemical Compositions of Dorsal Muscle of Hybrid Amberjacks, Seriola quinqueradiata×S. aureovittata and S. dumerili×S. aureovittata
Published in
Aquaculture Science, October 2010
DOI 10.11233/aquaculturesci1953.48.677
Authors

Osamu MURATA, KATO Keitaro, NASU Toshiro, Shigeru MIYASHITA, Ken-ichi IZUMI, Hidemi KUMAI

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2022.
All research outputs
#17,636,985
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Aquaculture Science
#128
of 176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,184
of 110,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aquaculture Science
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 176 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.