The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Variation in foraging patterns as reflected by floral resources used by male vs female bees of selected species at Badlands National Park, SD, USA
|
---|---|
Published in |
Arthropod-Plant Interactions, February 2022
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11829-021-09881-x |
Authors |
Diane L. Larson, Zachary M. Portman, Jennifer L. Larson, Deborah A. Buhl |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 16% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
Researcher | 2 | 11% |
Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 6 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 42% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 21% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 6 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2024.
All research outputs
#8,896,129
of 26,255,623 outputs
Outputs from Arthropod-Plant Interactions
#108
of 330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,031
of 541,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthropod-Plant Interactions
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,255,623 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 330 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 541,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.