Title |
Distinct spatial scale sensitivities for early categorization of faces and places: neuromagnetic and behavioral findings
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00091 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bhuvanesh Awasthi, Paul F. Sowman, Jason Friedman, Mark A. Williams |
Abstract |
Research exploring the role of spatial frequencies in rapid stimulus detection and categorization report flexible reliance on specific spatial frequency (SF) bands. Here, through a set of behavioral and magnetoencephalography (MEG) experiments, we investigated the role of low spatial frequency (LSF) (<8 cycles/face) and high spatial frequency (HSF) (>25 cycles/face) information during the categorization of faces and places. Reaction time measures revealed significantly faster categorization of faces driven by LSF information, while rapid categorization of places was facilitated by HSF information. The MEG study showed significantly earlier latency of the M170 component for LSF faces compared to HSF faces. Moreover, the M170 amplitude was larger for LSF faces than for LSF places, whereas the reverse pattern was evident for HSF faces and places. These results suggest that SF modulates the processing of category specific information for faces and places. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
France | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 44 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 23% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
Professor | 3 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 19% |
Unknown | 7 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 27 | 57% |
Engineering | 3 | 6% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 8 | 17% |