The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
In silico Identification of Immune Cell-Types and Pathways Involved in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Medicine, July 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fmed.2022.926753 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Connor Prosty, Sofianne Gabrielli, Moshe Ben-Shoshan, Michelle Le, Ana M. Giménez-Arnau, Ivan V. Litvinov, Philippe Lefrançois, Elena Netchiporouk |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Lecturer | 2 | 17% |
Professor | 1 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 8% |
Chemistry | 1 | 8% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,128,794
of 24,036,420 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Medicine
#295
of 6,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,861
of 423,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Medicine
#17
of 566 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,036,420 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,393 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 566 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.